Wednesday, April 27, 2005

 

Jonathan Gurwitz Responds

Last week I commented on a column by Jonathan Gurwitz in a post called "A Gurwitz Puzzler." Reinforcing why he is one of our favorites SAEN columnists, Mr. Gurwitz has taken the time to respond to our commentary. Most folks over at the SAEN will not take the time to respond to our commentary (especially publicly) and we appreciate Mr. Gurwitz's efforts. If you want to see my original comment then follow the link above. Here is Mr. Gurwitz's response:
The strategy of Zarqawi and the Baathists has always been to plunge Iraq into civil war. By committing atrocities against the Shiite majority, the objective has been to provoke a violent response. Thus far, the Shiite leadership hasn't -- to their credit -- taken the bait.

Two things have changed in recent months. U.S. forces have severely undermined the fighting capability of the insurgents. Hitting hard targets is a decreasingly attractive option for the insurgents, who have taken significant losses in recent ambushes. As attacks on U.S. troops have declined, they have risen against soft targets -- Iraqi, namely Shiite, civilians.

This is occurring as the new government is struggling with sectarian power sharing. In other words, the insurgents have stepped up the Zarqawi strategy just as the sentiments and stakes are highest for the different political and ethnic groups and their leaders.

I'm not suggesting things are about to unravel. I am suggesting that the danger to Iraqi democrats is significantly greater. If a bomb takes out Jafari, I don't think you'll see the equivalent of the Cedar Revolution in Iraq.

In retrospect, it might have been better to write, "The forces seeking to plunge Iraq into sectarian conflict have intensified their efforts at a critical moment." But then I'd have to spend some space explaining the critical moment, as above. With only 140 lines, I wanted to move to the more meaningful -- to my mind -- development: Iraqis taking an increasing role in their own destiny.

Comments:
It sounds like J.G. is a pretty good guy. How can he stand working there? ;-)

Kelly
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

archives